Mrs Mervelee Myers, Alma Grove, Bermondsey, London SE1 5PY
Employment Tribunals
Montague Court
101 London Road
West Croydon Surrey
CRO 2RF
10th February 2017
Dear Sir or Madam
Mrs Mervelee Myers v London Early Years Foundation (LEYF)
Case Number: 230047/2016
Communications with the Respondent LEYF Nurseries after 15th February 2017
Respondent’s Representative – Mr John Fenton, Personnel Consultancy Ltd, The.
In response to Mr #JohnFenton letter of the 8th February 2017, I would like to continue with my #DefensivePractice documenting evidence in my defence. Mr John Fenton is now saying he will not be in the United Kingdom from the 15th February 2017 to the 5th March 2017. Therefore he will not be responding to correspondences/communications to do with this claim that is part-heard and recommences on Tuesday the 28th February 2017.
Analysis 30/8/2018: This is the pattern of how the Respondent chose to act unprofessionally from as far back as before I was forced to resign. If you look at the correspondences with Senior HR Dilys Epton, it can be noted that her excuses were she is/was away on annual leave. This pattern continued when Barrister Samantha Jones who informed the judges that she did not prepare a case, got the Case adjouned with a manufactured sickness overnight.
I have no authority concerning Mr John Fenton’s sudden decisions, but he admitted on the 21st December 2016 after the #adjournment of the case that he is “NOT A SOLICITOR, but #HRManagement” and I don’t have a clue how this might impact on the case. Because I have no “#LegalTrainings”, except I have done my “#Research”. Mr John Fenton has breached the “#HumanRightsAct1998 and the UK Data Protection Act and the Equality Act, 2010” colluding unprofessionally with the Respondent to “DISCRIMINATE against me” from we corresponded with each other and met, from 15th March 2016.
But “#WithoutPrejudice” I would like to bring to the Employment Tribunal Courts attention that from the first time Mr John Fenton met me at the “Preliminary Hearing on the 15th March 2016”, I discussed with him about my intentions.
Analysis 30/8/2018: I was contacted by Bates Wells Braithwaite on the 25th September 2015. After the Open Letter and other correspondences, I did not hear from them again. Mr Fenton gave me the impressions when we meet on the 15th March 2016 that her was representing BWB. I did not hear from BWB again until after the ET judgement was posted online. Then BWB got Facebook and Twitter Legal Team to contact me. It’s since going through documents for the EAT that I realised that LEYF correspondence stated that Mr Fenton was consulted when I put in my Grievances for Discrimination and reasonable Adjustment.
These #intentions involved the “Safeguarding of the Employees Jobs, so the Respondent should consider the ACAS Conciliations”. Mr John Fenton made it clear he knew I could not handle the “STRESS” of the Employment tribunals case. I asked if he’d seen my FILE, and he said yes. He could only get the information from my FILE about me not being able to handle the #stress. But what did the Respondent and Mr John Fenton do, continue to treat me like I am an idiot. That’s why we are at this stage, when the matter could have been resolved #amicably.
Another of my intentions was to get the justice with my “#Fight4justice” campaign that was launched on Social Media with the Respondent’s knowledge when they refused to listen to me and “GAGGED” me from the 30th January 2015. Hence the reasons I was contacted by the Solicitors Bates Wells Braithwaite on the 24th September 2015”. I don’t understand Mr Fenton’s reasons for suddenly #jumping ship. I told him verbally and in written communications about all he needed to know about the Respondent’s “INCOMPETENCE and UNPROFESSIONALISM” from March 2015 to date. Now he has put his career in #jeopardy he is making sure he is not in the UK, but he will have questions to answer on his return.
Analysis 30/8/2018: I am part of Dr Maria Hudson Research Paper Ref:01/12. Recommened to ACAS: research@acas.org.uk & www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers. There is a Clause 15. I informed Isabella Glen about this during the Investigation on the 12th March 2015 at BIB. Barrister Jones keep reiterating that I know if I was sacked, I could not get another job. The Respondent know I was blacklisted and networking against. That’s why the same place I started when I joined the Respondent’s organisation, I left with safeguarding flagged. That’s why I am unable to get a job.
I am hoping Ms #SamanthaJones is fully recovered from the “CONTAGIOUS ILLNESS” that caused her GP to #quarantine her on the 21st December 2016 which caused the adjournment of the case. Not only that, I would be grateful to be #forewarned about any “Health Conditions” that might impact on my DISABILITIES during my attendance at the Employment Tribunals from the 28th February to 3rd March 2017.
Analysis 30/8/2018: If the Respondent look through my FILE they will see at Declaration of Health that I used the word #holistic”? Well that’s the grounds on which the EAT have been granted. Looking at Lynne Kelly “Witness Statement” she states that I told her about my diabetes from day one. However the Respondent did not inform her. Now what fact did the ET judges used to come up with their judgement? I informed them the Respondent did not update the contract I signed in line with the Equality Act 2010.
Since I learned that one of the Witnesses Mr #RashidIqbal has resigned from the Respondent’s employ, his last day was the 8th February 2017. I would like to know who will be answering the questions I have for that witness.
Analysis 30/8/2018: There have been resignations since I left the Respondent’s employ. How many of the 7 witnesses are still in the Respondent’s employ? Want to know more about the Respondent’s breaching the Employment Tribunal Law? Read the reviews at http://www.leyf.org.uk.
On the day Mr John Fenton, Mr #ChesterPinder and I met at the Employment Tribunals on the 15th March 2016, I asked about the relationship between him and Ms #DilysEpton. Without Prejudice, I would like Ms Epton to address this question in the absence of Mr John Fenton.
I am very disappointed about the way the Respondent have gone about the way I was treated from the 23rd July 2014 to date. But not only that, they have #ruined all of the fond memories I have of my working partnerships with them from 1st September 2009 to 22nd July 2014. That’s the reason I will ensure that #lessonsarelearned so that no other employees and their families are DESTROYED to suit the egos of the type of Leaderships and Management at London Early Years Foundation. The Respondent have destroyed the work of the “#Pioneers, the Founders of Westminster Children’s Society” for their own selfish self-gratitude to become the biggest, in the Early Years Sector.
Analysis 30/8/2018: If the Respondent is/was such a good employer, why are their staff leaving?
I am on a #mission to get justice for my fellow former colleagues who were DISCRIMINATED against for supporting me. Not only that the Respondent continue to operate MODERN DAY SLAVERY PRACTICES as they abuse their power of authority as a “#LegalEntity”. However they are not learned enough to employ a Qualified Trained Solicitor to represent their case.
In so doing the DISCRIMINATION continued to #trigger and #exacerbate the DISABILITIES that caused me to be stripped of my BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS.
Analysis 30/8/2018: Just read https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 to find out why the Employment Tribunal Law needs reviewing.
Here is my correspondence from HM Courts & Tribunal Service 30th July 2018. Employment Tribunal/Employment Appeals Tribunal Fee Refund. On 26 July 2017, The UK Supreme Court handed down the judgement in the case of R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] quashing the relevant Tribunals fees order. If you believe that you may be entitled to a refund, https:/.www.gov.uk/employment-tribunals/refund-fees.
Well I did tell UNISON https://www.unison.org.uk/, that I would get back to them one day. That’s for another publications ands a book.
Yours faithfully
Mervelee Myers
Cc: Ms Dilys Epton, Mr John Fenton.
See Your Memorieschevron-right
“The cause of women’s emancipation is part of our national struggle against outdated practices and prejudices. It is a struggle that demands equal effort from both men and women alike.” ~ Nelson Mandela in an address to the National Conference of Commitments: Gender & Women Empowerment, Kempton Park, South Africa, 23 February 1996 #LivingTheLegacy #MadibaRemembered




It’s not who you know. It’s about who knows you!
LikeLiked by 1 person