Dear Mrs Myers,
Our decision about your complaint
On 14th December 2020 we received your complaint. Thank you for taking the time to raise your concerns with us. You raised concerns about the necessity for your arrest on the 29th November 2020, the use of force used to carry out this arrest, and the lack of protective equipment used by the officers involved, to help keep you COVID safe. MM Updates: How can PC Neil Solliss expect me to treat him with any respect when he gets the first paragraph of his decision wrong? Refer to https://www.lamethcollege.ac.uk Student of Year Certificate 1997-1999.
My role was to review your complaint and, in accordance with the Police Reform Act 2002, consider how your complaint should be handled. In reaching this decision I took account of guidance issued by the IOPC on the handling of complaints.
This guidance and other information about complaints handling can be found on the IOPC website at https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/. MM Updates: Let me make it clear that the IOPC is corrupt based on my dealings with Ratna Khanam Our Reference: 2019/119249 and Force Reference: PC/7/19 Casework Manager IOPC Email: email@example.com with the unprofessional conduct.
Where appropriate, this matter has also been considered by the relevant Appropriate
Authority (AA), who is an officer or member of staff who has delegated authority from the Commissioner, to approve how your complaint has been handled and the actions I have taken. MM Updates: How about the AA deal with Claim Number: F21YM135 Andrew Truby Lawyer For The Director General IOPC 10 South Colonnade, London, E14 4PU Tel: 020-7166-5046.
Should your complaint be ‘Logged’? Yes ☒ No ☐
If ‘Logged’, ‘Must’ or ‘Should’ it be recorded under Schedule 3 PRA? Yes ☒ No ☐
If recorded, ‘Must’ or ‘Should’ your complaint be investigated? Yes ☐ No ☒
Relevant Review Body (RRB): MOPAC
Logged and Recorded, handled otherwise than by investigation.
This means that we have ‘Recorded’ your complaint under Schedule 3 PRA, but have
determined that it does not meet the criteria where it either must or should be subject to a formal investigation. This does not mean that we have not looked into your concerns, but it does mean we have handled your concerns in a reasonable and proportionate manner. MM Updates: Please refer to Claim Number: F45YM082 and why I resorted to this measure because of the Hate Crimes of the Police from the time they refuse to act on my concerns about verbal threats. But turned up to section from the malicious report of www.peachespublications.co.uk who was groomed by https://www.ryanclement.com, both of them BLACK.
Complaint Allegation(s) and Officer(s)/Staff identified where relevant
Complaint Number 1
Allegation Officers identified Holly Sweeney P255654
1 B3-Power to arrest and detain: You were arrested after explaining you couldn’t attend the police station owing to other commitments and weren’t given an opportunity to change the date/time to negate the need for arrest
2 B4-Use of force: You are complaining about the way in which you were arrested, stating officers acted like hooligans, leaving you bruised, owing to the way you were handled.
Holly Sweeney P255654
Nikki Wright P240060
3 B9-Other policies and procedures: The officers did not wear or offer any Personal
Protective Equipment when dealing with you, putting you and your family at risk of COVID.
Holly Sweeney P255654
Nikki Wright P240060
Harry Stack P255641
Ben Godfrey P255842
Reasonable and Proportionate Handling
I have taken the following steps to address your concerns, which I consider to be both reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances, to address the matters described above. MM Updates: The www.collins.co.uk Definition of Reasonable: 1. Sensible 2. Not excessive 3. Logical. Definition of Proportionate: Being in proportion.
Where I have not pursued a particular line of enquiry, this is because I believe this would not be reasonable or proportionate, taking into consideration all of the circumstances. MM Updates: As you can note from the time I sent the definition of HOOLIGANS to you via email I realise you have not attained the Prime much more the Specific areas of the EYFS www.ofsted.gov.uk curriculum.
My actions take account of the guidance provided in the IOPC Focus guide on the
reasonable and proportionate handling of complaints.
I have provided a summary of the information obtained as a result of each of the steps taken.
In order to deal with your complaint, I have reviewed the following documents:
Your original complaint.
An email chain between you and I, dated 7th to 14th January 2021 (where you have detailed your concerns further).
A copy of the custody record from when you arrived at custody and where your
detention was authorised – reference: 01MS/5510/20
The Crime record relating to the offence you were arrested in connection with –
Reference: CRIS 3031780/20
The incident log relating to your arrest, otherwise known as a computer aided
dispatch (CAD) record 5862/29NOV20.
A statement completed by the arresting officer PC Holly Sweeney on the 30th
November 2020, whilst the incident would have been still fresh in her mind.
A use of force form completed by the assisting officer PC Nikki Wright.
Body Worn Video (BWV) footage of attending officers, PC Holly Sweeney, PC Nikki
Wright, PC Harry Stack and PC Ben Godfrey.
Linked crime record 3033060 20, relating to a similar incident between you and the
same alleged victim.
Linked custody record 01LD/8600/20, relating to your arrest for the separate incident.
I have not spoken with the officers as I was able to draw inference from the video
footage which was clear and audible.
Crime report 3031780/20 was recorded on the 16th November 2020, relating to an allegation
of criminal damage which occurred Sunday 15th November 2020 whereby you were named
suspect for the offence.
Police have an obligation to investigate all allegations of crime in a reasonable way, and to
remain impartial in any investigative process.
As a named suspect, police recognise that your account is fundamental in helping prove and disprove the allegations against you, so an important and often essential part of the investigative progress. It is also essential to recognise that obtaining your account runs a risk where your answers may incriminate you, so in order to protect you, you are awarded certain rights, details of which can be found in the police codes of practice (C), contrary to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). I attach a link to this record for your attention here:
Usual practice when dealing with named suspects is for the officer in the case (OIC) to make attempts to deal with the suspect within 48 hours prior to being circulated as a wanted person on the Police National Computer (PNC).
MM Updates: Here are my websites: https://www.google.com Search Engine will send you to my WordPress and https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.site. Here are my YouTube: 1. My Website: http://www.youtube.com/Channel/UCBcqloBmT16XFBLAOPdvtFw Custom URL https://www.youtube.com/c/RattyNembhardGaGaStreetRebel at your service from 2012. Number 2: https://myaccount.google.com/b/107858638420456774272/email recently.
The crime report shows PC Holly Sweeney was assigned as the OIC on the 17th November 2020. MM Updates: Why did PC Sweeney failed to act from the date she was assigned? Please refer to http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19434472.2015.1108352 for why I will take the Police to pieces for their Hate Crimes against me from 30/10/2017.
In your complaint, you have stated that your received a phone call from some who sounded female and introduced themselves as a police officer on the 29th November 2020, asking you to attend Walworth Police Station on the 1st December at 10am. You explained you could not attend at this given time, owing to a pre-arranged Drs Appointment where you were booked in to get a “flu jab”. During the conversation of trying to get the officer to compromise, she called you a “criminal” and hung up.
As an organisation, we are fully aware that we police by consent and are victim focused but not victim led. As a named suspect, the OIC had already passed the 2 day recommended period to try and speak to you before circulating you as a wanted person, meaning time had already been given where possible evidence could be concealed and an alibi or defence devised. MM Updates: Please refer to websites and YouTube for why in treating a Building better than MERVELEE MYERS the Police is covering up https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/coronavirus-london-early-years-nurseries-unite/#.XpQfd4vU6lc.mailto and the Reviews online and conversation in one of my videos with a parent near to BIB LEYF.
In her statement dated 30th November 2020, PC Sweeney confirmed being the officer who called you, stating “I explained she was an outstanding suspect (Not a criminal as you state) MM Updates: Here again is Racial Profiling to be found in https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 and that she needed to visit Walworth Police Station for an interview”. PC Sweeney described your response as very calm initially, where you stated you had a doctor’s appointment at 10:30hrs so the date would not suit you. MM Updates: PC Sweeney is a LIAR and must be related to some of those involved with www.leyf.org.uk terrorism after I got back from burying my mother. My stories are on https://www.facebook.com PAGES which are PUBLIC. PC Sweeney then states “I tried to suggest some other dates, however, Mrs Myers declined this invitation and started screaming down the phone, saying she wouldn’t be visiting a police station. Her manner was very aggressive and this is what led to the arrest enquiry”. MM Updates: Why did I call the Number on 30/11/2020 then? For there to be no ambiguity, I recorded the call and in the Public Domain as my Defensive Practice against the Police who turned TERRORIST from they visited my home on 30/10/2017. Refer to www.ico.org.uk SAR 2018.
What this means is although PC Sweeney was under no obligation to change the required date and time, she was willing and attempted to be reasonable in finding alternative appointments for you to attend a police station for an interview. MM Updates: Why is it stated in paragraph 1 that my arrest was on the 29/11/2020? What was the date and time I was given over the phone on 29/11/2020 and why did PC Sweeney and her THUGS turned up at my house on 30/11/2020? Let me tell you, to MURDER me and claimed I committed SUICIDE under the Mental Health Act 2015. I was already made a victim of www.hctgroup.org Statistic of 1 in 5 of all suicides are associated with unemployment. Unfortunately, her suggestions were met with your refusal, which is evidence to suggest you would not come freely, meaning your arrest would now be necessary, in order to investigate the allegation promptly and effectively,
MM Updates: What was PC Holly Sweeney doing from she was assigned the case 17/11/2020 to calling me 29/11/2020 to attending my home 30/11/2020? May I say making plans to MURDER me under cover of June O’Sullivan 14 LEYF Margaret Horn Lecture. Well it was at www.aoug.org.uk Lecture October 2015 it was revealed to me how June O’Sullivan turned psychopath and sanctioned discrimination against me. Contrary to s.24 (5) PACE, details of which can be found here:
CAD5862/29NOV11 shows PC Sweeney generated an arrest enquiry for your arrest at
approximately 7:14hrs on the 29th November 2020, recording your arrest as necessary for a prompt and effective investigation and to prevent any further damage to property. MM Updates: Refer to the Reviews online and www.personnelconsultancy.com letter to Employment Tribunal LondonSouthET@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk about submitting Additional Witness Statement when I got hold of the 3 Reviews about the abuses at LEYF during the Adjournment since the ET claim am not a credible witness.
This log shows no arrest enquiry was carried out that evening and at approximately 2:35pm on the 30th November 2020, the record shows you had been arrested. MM Updates: Can the Intellectual Imbeciles who provided this report explain the discrepancies in the first paragraph to here? I studied 2004 – 2010 with www.open.ac.uk/ceremonies and worked in partnerships with Communities of Practices.
BWV shows all attending officers including PC Sweeney who was a double crew unit with PC Harry Stack. Also assigned was a marked police van unit, staffed by PC Nikki Wright and PC Ben Godfrey.
The image shows you open your front door and invite the officers in, before walking back into your home, allowing the door to close behind you. MM Updates: What is the purpose of saying allowing the door to close behind me if you stated I invited them in? I done training with www.cardboardcitizens.org.uk and they sponsored me for training at www.morleycollege.ac.uk too. Must state I was sponsored by by http://unison.org.uk for the Health & Social Care Level 2 course at the Open University because some point this will be relevant. The officers entered and eventually located you in the front room on the ground floor, sat at a computer at the far end of a room.
MM Updates: Is Neil Solliss saying they visited Alma Grove without doing checks to find out which house I live in? So did the Officers went upstairs as this Stupid Person is alluding to? Here is the proof that PC Holly Sweeney did not do any investigations and relied on Racial Profiling and Hate Crimes from the ET/EAT Judgments to visit my home to MURDER me to claim I committed SUICIDE. Where is the far end of the room located? For the information of this RACIST IGNORANT Police, at the window where I looked out and see the Police on the visits to my home 30/10/2017, 30/11/2020 and 1/12/2020. For your information I was homeless as a result of Domestic Abuse and rescued by www.hfw.org.uk so why should the Police get away with coming to TERRORIZE me?
You appeared to be actively engaged with the computer and completely disregard the officers, avoiding any eye contact whilst facing away, seemingly unaffected by their attendance. MM Updates: More reference of Racial Profiling as I was the EYFS Coordinator, SENCO and Multigenerational Working Approach Facilitator. I discussed my intentions with Professor Tony Bertram EECERA https://www.eecera.org and Dr Chris Pascal OBE www.crec.co.uk at LEYF Big Childcare Conversation 19/9/2015. I was endorsed on https://www.linkedin.com where I was an INFLUENCER. Can PC Solliss have a guess at why I am refused access to my account?
PC Sweeney then informed you of the allegation and you remained disengaged. MM Updates: Definition of Disengage: Release from a connection. Can PC Solliss explain this for me to understand please. She continued to inform you that you were under arrest and fully cautioned you and yet you remained focused on your screen and appeared to ignore PC Sweeney and the important information she was explaining to you. MM Updates: All am saying is PC Sweeney is not even a good LIAR. Can this stupid person go back to read my complaint and any other materials relevant to this case. After inviting them in my home, I was relieved they had come because no one answered the phone and by this time the triggers for my PTSD were exacerbated www.healthmanltd.com advised me to seek CBT to find out why I react to certain situations the way I do when I was sent on Medical Suspension in breach of the Contract I signed on 7/10/2009. PC Sweeney suggested you would benefit from putting on some shoes and you told her you would not be going with her, telling her you have a doctor’s appointment the next day at 2:30pm, (a different time to that you provided by phone). MM Updates: Please go back to previous paragraphs to see how you are contradicting yourself. My 10 year old grandson would do a better job than you. I was a www.jbsf.org.uk Basic School Teacher in Jamaica. PC Wright tried to assure you that you would be released before then, so would not affect your appointment. MM Updates: Since LEYF set out to destroy me www.nelsonmandela.org and www.nelsonmandeladay.com and archive.nelsonmandela.org “It is so easy to break down and destroy. The heroes are those who make peace and build.” Nelson Mandela during the 6th Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture, Walter Sisulu Square, Kliptown, Soweto, South Africa, 12 July 2008. The year I had the first nervous breakdown after the death of my brother with Colon Cancer. After which I joined www.cruk.org Race For Life.
You maintained your stance, saying she can interview you in your home. PC Sweeney explained this was not possible and you began to use your phone. MM Updates: More proof of how the Police intention was to MURDER me. Evidence to support my argument was day after the ET ended at www.nurseryworld.co.uk Show 2017 I was stalked by 2 White Men on behalf of Liz Roberts Editor of Nursery World Magazine who excluded me from Nursery World FORUM on LinkedIn where I was an INFLUENCER. I was the one doing the talking asking if they come to interview me. That’s when PC Sweeney shouted they were here to arrest me. I turned around to get a letter about the Meeting at Southwark Police Station and she said she was not here for that either. Anyone with any sense knows that Phones are locked and codes have to be keyed in. I picked up my phone and was told am not allowed to use it, and I put it down. Refer to www.slam-iapt.nhs.uk/ for clarifications as I was diagnosed with Chronic Anxiety in 2006 because I do not have Medical Diagnosis for www.parkinsons.org.uk in my DNA and later found out I have Atypical Parkinsonism.
One of the female officers reminded you that as you were under arrest, you were advised to stop using your electronic devises and PC Nikki Wright explains to you that if you do not cooperate by going with the officers freely, they will have to use force and you replied telling her they’d have to drag you.
MM Updates: Obviously this is from the visits of the 2 PCs who visited my home on 1/12/2020. I have no conversations with any other Officer inside my house except PC Holly Sweeney on the 30/11/2020. Everything happened in a flash. Because 3 ICT Equipment were left on until I returned home. The 2 PCs who visited on 1/12/2020 were the ones acting like hooligans until I told them I would not allow them to treat me how I was on 30/11/2020. When my husband ask me to turn off the ICT they said I didn’t have time but I insisted and they calm down after I informed them I know my RIGHTS www.victimsupport.org.uk in 2000 when I ran to Brixton Police Station 367 Brixton Road, London, SW9 7DD Tel: 0207-326-1212 Crime Reference: 1239892/00B Reported 8/9/200. Walworth Police Station Crime Reference Number: 30132321/04 Southwark Police Tel: 0207-233-6633 Date: 12/4/2004 for support. As can be verified from the second interview when PC Holly Sweeney made reference to my Meeting at Southwark Police Station. I made clear I lost trust in the Police. I was a participant in Dr Maria Hudson www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers “The Experience of Discrimination on Multiple Grounds.”
You then got up out of your seat and made a clear attempt to leave the room, trying to walk straight past the officers whilst shouting that you wished to speak with your husband. MM Updates: As I have said the Officers did not have much interactions with me except for PC Sweeney I won’t swear, I have not been arrested before, so therefore is/was unaware of the “Arrest Procedures” and these were not explained to me. All I can say if this was the case why did one of the Officers not explain they would have to accompany me to speak to my husband? The 2 Officers who came on the 1/12/2020 explained one would have to accompany me to the toilet and put her foot in the door, in case I escaped. When my husband questioned this, I told him she was doing her job. PC HOLLY SWEENEY and her TERRORIST THUGS are FUCKING LIARS and this is the Queen’s Language www.ofsted.gov.uk use of Mother Tongue. It is clear from the image you were aware you were under arrest and were being obstructive, and resistive to the arrest. At this time you had been informed
you were under arrest and fully cautioned and you had made it clear you would not be cooperating. You were now making attempts to walk off and both officers stopped you by holding you by your arms whilst you continue to scream out for your husband and attempt to break free. The officers then place you into handcuffs and PC Wright asked you to stop resisting explaining to you that it would not hurt if you assisted rather than resisted. In her use of force notes, PC Wright has stated “female was actively resisting arrest and trying to leave the room. MM Updates: I refuse to waste my time with IDIOTS and refer you to http://www.radar-cns.org as I was a participant in Mental Health Research.
She was struggling with officers and tensing up, making her difficult to restrain. MM Updates: Definition of Tense 1. Emotionally strained 2. Stretched tight 3. Make or become tense. Can these IDIOTS go back to all I have written and consult http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk for why I complained about HHJ Parfitt. Because I had to call the Ambulance out on 3/9/2020 because I could not control the SHAKES in my body. My history about the role POLICE played in my PTSD is in the Public Domain. The fact my brother done a CRIMINAL ACT and waited in CHURCH for the POLICE would give an idea about our relationship with Police. We were brought up to RESPECT their AUTHORITY. Finally one of my brother was a Police and I helped with his test.
Force was used to apply handcuffs to secure her, thus protecting officers and assisting the arrest and preventing disappearance. MM Updates: These Officers obviously need COUNSELLING as they were unable to carry out the MURDER they got paid for and suffering Delusions of Grandeur. At the Nursery World Show 2018 I was assaulted by a Young White Girl wearing LEYF shirt who tried to grab my phone. I did not know her, but I managed to get photos when I noticed her taking an interest in me. I walked away and when she didn’t get my phone she ran off in the next direction saying she was going to call Security. I was not the aggressor, she was. The next day I paid to go to June O’Sullivan’s Seminar to ascertain which of my Intellectual Property she was making money from. That is when the plot to get me taken away unfolded. I did not go back to the Nursery World Show after, it had become a Hostile Environment where my PTSD can be triggered and exacerbated to make me a victim. That is exactly what happened when the http://www.met.police.uk send the TERRORIST THUGS of Holly Sweeney, Nikki Wright, Harry Stack and Ben Godfrey to carry out what LEYF Brown NOSERS had not managed before. But why did they make so many blunders, because of my Parents GOD protecting me https://www.facebook.com/PembrokeHouse/videos/302334554093821/?
Whilst struggling with the female, she took hold of the handle of my Taser so I used pain compliance techniques on her fingers to release her grip”. MM Updates: It is obvious who needs to be sectioned under the Mental Health Act 2015. Can I get explanation for how I was struggling with the female and took hold of the handle of my Taser at the same time? Considering by now my Chronic Anxiety would have been triggered and I would be SHAKING and unable to function, normally. It’s obvious this person who made this statement is a CONTRACT KILLER and I missed ending up like George Floyd on 30/11/2020 in my home. Because no one would be able to give a different account from these PSYCHOPATHS. I wrote Open Letters to 2 https://www.gov.uk Prime Minister. David Cameron’s intervention led me to gain qualifications and I would like to include websites for the benefit of these IDIOTS. Unit 3: Equality, Diversity, And Inclusion In Work With Children And Young People. Websites: 1. Centre for Research in Education Inclusion and Diversity – www.creid.ed.ac.uk, 2. Department for Education – www.education.gov.uk, 3. Equality and Human Rights Commission – www.equalityhumanrights.com, 4. Inclusion – www.inclusion.ngfl.gov.uk, 5. Teachernet – www.teachernet.gov.uk as part of LSA Training. It was Theresa May Government that rejected https://petition.parliament.uk/help#standards that we can have Police Officers coming to my house to MURDER me and making up such an excuse about me grabbing Taser and having to use force to get my fingers off. Sometimes my fingers don’t even work. Once again PREMEDITATED and why Sergeant Patel keep referring to “How FIT” I am/was. Racial Profiling for the Intellectual Imbeciles.
She has further stated that her use of force powers came from s.3 Criminal Law Act 1967 and provide a link to the full details of this act here:
PC Sweeney has explained in her statement “PC Wright and I tried to verbally stop her walking past but Mrs Myers raised the tone of her voice and continued to push passed us. MM Updates: My MAD HEAD now my PTSD was triggered says as soon as I got up off the chair I was grabbed by 3 Officers and handcuffed. I started calling Tom when I was grabbed by the 3 Officers because by this time I was in a PANIC and fearing for my life. My husband was not aware of what was happening in the living room until the male Officer went to the kitchen to ask if he is Tom. By this time I was taken to the van. The male Officer came out after to sit in the van with me. Whilst the Females were in the house. My husband told me later than PC Sweeney searched my bedroom.
I stopped this by taking hold of her and then placing her in handcuffs to help take her to the police station” She has referred to s.117 PACE, details of which are provided in this link here:
I can see from the image that you had clearly made attempts to obstruct the constables and resist arrest and any force used to secure you was reasonable and necessary. It is clear you would not have gone with the officers freely and only once secured with handcuffs, did you stop resisting, confirming to me the effectiveness of placing you in handcuffs. I am satisfied the officers would not have been able to secure you safely had you not been handcuffed.
The BWV shows you walking with the officers to the caged area of the van where you
were placed inside. Whilst being placed inside, I heard you say words similar to “these are squeezing”. Although it isn’t clear what you were referring to, I feel it is reasonable to assume you were referring to the handcuffs. The only officer who appears to demonstrate any sign of hearing you is PC Sweeney who responds with “mmm mmm”, a verbal sound I recognise as meaning “yes, I hear you”. However, she continued to allow you into the van making no attempts to check the handcuffs. This in itself could be considered as a failing to look after you whilst under her care, however, when placed into the handcuffs just a couple of minutes prior to this, PC Sweeney has confirmed in her statement that the handcuffs had been checked for tightness and double locked to prevent them tightening further, and BWV supports this. This means she had considered your welfare and I am confident this would not have changed in this short period of time from you being placed in handcuffs to being walked to the van. Although rigid handcuffs can cause discomfort, I am
satisfied they were checked to confirm they would not cause any unnecessary harm or discomfort other than that which is unavoidable, so do not feel it was necessary for her to check these once again, so soon after. MM Updates: Let me say I told the male Officer who was sat in the van the handcuffs were hurting me, first time am aware of saying it. But if PC Sweeney’s response to hearing me saying it means there were no due regards about my welfare considering COVID-19 and the implications. Let me direct you to www.southwark.gov.uk/covidsupport and firstname.lastname@example.org for why PC Sweeney did not care about my welfare because I was not expected to be alive to tell any tales. She never asked me about any disabilities and when I was in the van parked at Walworth Police Station I started SHAKING and that’s when she flippantly asked “By the way Mervelee do you have any COVID symptoms?” I said is that not too late to be asking. I was SHAKING because I was half naked and my PTSD was triggered. I explained to the male Officer who I called over to inform him I had to call the Ambulance out on 3/9/2020 because I could not control the shakes. What ensued after is in my complaint, I won’t repeat myself. Must I direct your attention to Section 60 of the Equality Act 2010 and http://www.acas.org/uk/earlyconciliation that I tried. The United Nation Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) Article 14 states that it is a basic entitlement of humans to enjoy their rights and freedoms without discrimination on any grounds. After taking away my job which affected my mental and physical disabilities LEYF made attempts on my life. The final by the POLICE on 30/11/2020.
BWV shows the officers continued to show a duty of care towards you and your husband after your arrest too. PC Wright returned to your home once you were secured in the van, and she spoke with your husband to confirm he would be safe if left, and asked for any medication you may need whilst detained. MM Updates: My husband told me it was only the male Officer who spoken to him when he came in the kitchen. The 2 Females did not talk to him. Tom only knew what was happening when he went to the kitchen. My husband said he made toast for me at the time. He said PC Sweeney was in my bedroom searching. The Police entered my home thinking I was on my own, not aware my husband was here.
Custody record 01MS/5510/20, details you arriving at approximately 2:56pm (23 minutes after arrest), and the log shows your detention being authorised. This means the custody sergeant who is independent of the investigation, but there to insure your needs are met, has confirmed your arrest to be necessary. The use of force has also been logged, along with any medical concerns, and the record shows there to be no immediate concerns regarding any marks from the handcuffs. MM Updates: Apart from the Nurse who else had any conversation with me? PC Holly Sweeney asked how I was feeling. I told her like punching someone, but I don’t do physical, I write and they would star in their own show. Before I was taken into the Station, did I ask to use the toilet? When was I allowed to do so? Did they find out about any disabilities? Refer to www.diabestes.org.uk and www.desmond-project.org.uk and www.heal-d.co.uk too.
In your email dated 12th January 21, you informed me your GP had a record of your verbal account relating to bruising you received to your arms. In my email dated the 13th January 21, I asked you to confirm your GP had not seen any injury, explaining it would not be necessary to gain this document, as it would not confirm an injury, just your account, so would be no different than you giving me a description directly, rather than your GP giving me your account indirectly. I also asked for any photo evidence you had, relating to these injuries. You replied and confirmed the GP had not seen the injuries but referred me to obtain the images from the GP as you had submitted images so they should be on your record. I reminded you that I would require you to provide me with these images directly and this is because I do not consider it reasonable to request these images from your GP as this would prolong this outcome unnecessarily and also use up time from your GP’s surgery by asking them to provide details you already have. MM Updates: WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU TO QUESTION ME ABOUT MY CREDIBILITY WHILST ALLOWING THOSE PAID ASSASSINS TO GET TOGETHER TO MAKE UP THIS REPORT? No different from Judiciary of England & Wales Career Criminals. Here is the contacts for the GP NHS Decima Street Surgery & Artesian Health Centre, 6 Decima Street, London, SE1 4QX. Tele: 020-7403-3618 decimastreetsurgery.co.uk Full list of partners can be found at www.princessstreetgrouppractice.co.uk/practice-information/nexus-health-group-partners/. Office
At this time, you have not provided me with any images and because your GP would only be able to provide the verbal account you have already given, I do not feel it necessary to speak with your GP as I would only be interested in what he knows and not what he’s been told. Because I have nothing other than your account and the custody record to compare this against, I am satisfied any bruising would have been unavoidable owing to your behaviour which I witnessed on BWV. MM Updates: Once more you are using RACIAL PROFILING and let me remind you about the ET/EAT Judgments and the Protected Characteristics of the Equality Act 2010 and refer to my https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.site where you will be named as a RACIST bigot who discriminate on all grounds.
Furthermore, science recognises force to be when two objects interact, creating a force upon one and other. It is fair to suggest that your force of resistance was met with the officer’s force to restrain you and not the other way around. MM Updates: For your benefit refer to http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19434472.2015.1108352 Behavioural Sciences… As it backs up my arguments about the POLICE OFFICERS operating as PAID ASSASSINS under cover of the IOPC Policies and Procedures.
I am sorry to hear you suffered bruising but must remind you that it is important you comply with officers and their instructions and not to physically resist, and any concerns you have, can be looked into in due process, such as the complaint system you have since chosen. MM Updates: The entire https://www.gov.uk Legal Systems are CORRUPT. Let me list them 1. HMCTS: JCIO http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk 2. BSB www.barstandardsboard.org.uk 3. SRA www.sra.org.uk 4. CCMCC www.moneyclaim.gov.uk 5. CESLtd www.courtenforcementserviceltd.co.uk…
If there was any doubt regarding the necessity to arrest you, it would be fair to question why PC Sweeney felt arrest was necessary to prevent further damage.
Crime report 3033060/20 shows a separate allegation of criminal damage, reported on the morning of your arrest, and prior to your arrest, where it was alleged that on the 28th November 20 (The day before PC Sweeney phoned you), you re-attended the location of the previously reported crime and committed a second act of criminal damage. This shows PC Sweeney to be forward thinking in her decision making, albeit a little late. I am satisfied this was a legitimate reason to arrest you. MM Updates: In due course it will be proven why PC Sweeney failed to carry out any investigations as can be revealed from the REVIEWS and why the MEDIA and HMCTS covering for LEYF.
When addressing this timeframe, I can see this 2nd report was made to police approximately 7-8 hours prior to PC Sweeney arresting you. It would be reasonable to suggest that if PC Sweeney was aware of this 2nd incident, you could have been further arrested for this at the same time, reducing the necessity to arrest you again at a later date, something you state in your complaint you aren’t happy about.
As the arresting officer, PC Sweeney would have needed to conduct enquiries including a check on the PNC, to confirm you have no other outstanding matters. As mentioned previously, the PNC cannot be updated for 48 hours, because the OIC must first make other attempts to deal with you before circulating you nationally as a wanted person. I am satisfied PC Sweeney would not have been aware of this 2nd incident from conducting a PNC check so cannot hold her to account for this. MM Updates: Delaying tactics used to cover up my intended MURDER refer to my contributions in www.express.co.uk Mental Health CRUSADE.
Another system police use to carry out checks is recognised to police as the Integrated Information Platform (IIP). This is an internal police search engine system which cross references many other police software, including the system used to record crime (CRIS) records. It is fair to say a check on this system should show any outstanding crime reports where you are named as a suspect, however, this system updates approximately every 24 hours, and because the crime report was recorded within 24 hours of your arrest, this report would not have shown in any search either.
I’m sorry for the inconvenience this has caused. I’m sure arrest cannot be a pleasant
experience so having to endure this twice in as many days must have been very upsetting for you. Sadly, I cannot look to any officer to find fault, but rather an outdated system which I’m sure most officers would happily have updated. Sadly, constant budget cuts means that police have to remain with such equipment until upgrades can be issued, and hope this goes some way as to explaining why you were arrested twice. MM Updates: I will hold www.metpolice.uk for tracking down those mentioned in the REVIEWS online and those from my ET/EAT Cases and arrest them forthwith for ABUSES to children, young people and vulnerable adults.
I can see from the BWV that no officer had been wearing any Personal Protective Equipment (face masks and gloves), when attending your address. It has been made clear to all AS officers on a regular bases that officers must wear these and offer these in situations where close contact cannot be avoided. It is reasonable to suggest officers conducting an arrest enquiry would be aware close contact would be required so find it hard to see how or why officers attending your home, would not have considered this. Not only do they put a risk on you and those in your home, they put risk on themselves and their colleagues and families too. Although this would not have been a legal requirement at the time the officers attended
your home, this was a police policy and police officers are reminded to follow powers and policies. I have spoken with the officer’s line manager who has identified this as an isolated matter so feel it is appropriate I ask him to address this matter in a manner he feels appropriate and thank you for bringing this matter to my attention.
MM Updates: Won’t waste my time because you people are DEAD walking and only interested in collecting ASSASSIN Money from www.leyf.org.uk.
Schedule 3 Proportionate handling
Allegation Number 1
Officer Wt. No. P255654
Allegations Decision Service provided acceptable Action debrief of original incident
Rationale: The officer in the case has made attempts to deal with an investigation by
way of interview without arrest, however, you have made it clear you would not attend without arrest and furthermore, were alleged to have committing further offences, supporting a further need to arrest you, to prevent further damage.
P240060 Service provided acceptable explanation provided
Rationale: The officer has clearly verbalised to you that you were under arrest and under caution. You were given a reasonable opportunity to comply with instructions to go with the officers but resisted this by attempting to walk away, requiring the officers to restrain you in order to secure you.
P255842 Service provided not acceptable Informal action by line manager
Rationale: The officers have attended your home with the understanding they were there to carry out an arrest, meaning close contact would be likely and unavoidable. No officer has made any conscious effort to adhere to police policy which is to wear PPE in such cases and to offer this to you too. The line manager knows of no other incidences regarding this and will take action as their line manager to prevent repeat occurrences. MM Updates: Is it any wonder SAFEGUARDING is not prioritise and abuses in the REVIEWS are covered up.
Throughout the handling of this complaint, we have carefully considered whether there are any opportunities for learning or improvement.
Learning identified? Yes X
If yes, details are:
All officers have entered your home, equipped with Personal Protection Equipment, to help fight the COVID related pandemic. There has been many internal reminders for officers to insure they wear face coverings and gloves where close proximity is unavoidable. Officers are reminded to offer this protection to the people they are dealing with. It is clear from the image this did not happen and as an isolated incident, I have decided to inform the officer’s line manager, to deal with this matter in the manner in which they feel appropriate, to prevent further occurrences.
Your right to a review
If you think you have a reason for this decision to be reviewed, the Relevant Review body
is the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). You have 29 days from the date of
this letter to make your appeal. The 29th day is 15th February 2021. Appeals received after
29 days may not be considered unless there are exceptional circumstances.
MOPAC Police Complaint Reviews Team
21st Floor West
Empress State Building
Name, Rank / Grade: PC Neil Solliss
Unit: Professional Standards Unit, As BCU
Name of Appropriate Authority: Inspector Nikki Babb
GDPR – Any personal data submitted in the course of making a complaint will be processed and used to
provide an outcome to that complaint. Any right to Review will mean that the MPS will provide that data to
the Relevant Review Body for the conducting of that review.