When Will I Get Justice?


My Windrush Experiences Started In 2004 

Edits will be in (brackets and italise) with dates to show my analysis and evaluations. This is owing to the nature of the continuing discrimination I am encountering from all sections of the UK Government departments.

Case Number: 2300047/2016
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
BETWEEN
Claimant               and               Respondent
Mrs M Myers          v               London Early Years Foundation
HELD AT London South ON 21 December 2016
Before: Employment Judge Freer Members: Ms D Fennel Mr W Dixon
Appearances For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Mr J Fenton, Consultant
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Upon this matter being adjourned due to the unfortunate illness of Ms Jones, Counsel for the Respondent, the following orders are made:
(Edit: 12/6/2018. Despite there was a Judge’s Case Management Order for me to provide Medical Reports for my disabilities. The Judge refused to take them into consideration and instead used the Doctor’s Report from the Medical Suspension. I was passed fit for work, and had informed Senior HR Dilys Epton about my self-referral at Kings College Hospital. My childhood traumas was triggered in a toxic workplace after the death of my brother in 2008. For me this was history repeating itself as I told Isabella Glen on the 12th March 2015 and DE on the 27th March at the HOC when she came to trick me into going on Medical Suspension. So how come Ms Jones contrived manufactured contagious disease, turned out to be unfortunate illness overnight? I had to get counselling at www.slam-iapt.nhs.uk/southwark after another nervous breakdown in a workplace)  
1. This matter is relisted to be resumed before the same Tribunal panel at Croydon Employment Tribunals on 28 February and 01, 02, and 03 March 2017.
(Edit: The Judge http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment/claims/responding did not think I was prestgious enough to be consulted). 
2. The first half a day is for Tribunal reading and therefore the parties should attend at the Tribunal at 2.00pm on 28 February 2017.
(Edit: Why did it take 5 months to copy and past the Respondent’s Summary to post online? I called making enquiries and was given some flimsy excuses. After my experiences with http://www.gov.uk, I guess it’s hopeless for me to expect any better. There is incompetence at the highest levels. The Centre for Research in Education Inclusion and Diversity www.creid.ac.uk is worth researching).
3. No further evidence shall be allowed save for exceptional circumstances and by Tribunal order. The case shall resume from the same position it ended.
(Edit: There were exceptional circumstances, but the Judge had already made up his mind. He did not even want to know about the fact John Fenton failed to comply with the Case Management Orders and left out the Medical Reports. John Fenton made admissions that were relevant to the case www.personnelconsultancy.com). 
4. The Claimant is released from oath particularly so that she may seek any legal advice required and correspond with the Respondent as appropriate.
(Edit: I was only released from oath so that John Fenton could try to trick me. This was done in the presence of Mr Trevor Tomlinson, Mrs Winnifred Jacques and Mrs Carlene Graham. But despite corresponding with the ET about Mr John Fenton unprofessionalism and lack of legal knowledge, my concerns were not heeded. That’s why www.bwbllp.com got Facebook and Twitter Legal Team to contact me after the judgement went online. But where were they after my Open Letter?)   
1
Case Number: 2300047/2016
5. The Claimant by order and consent will not make any postings on social media relating to any of the Respondent’s witnesses, legal representatives, the Tribunal and/or the Tribunal proceedings.
(Edit: As can be ascertain, the Respondent breach the contract I signed from the time I was sent the invitation to the Disciplinary by tampering with my data. Everything else to do with Social Media was contrived when the CEO June O’Sullivan visited BIB on the 28th January 2015 and tried tricking me to breach the Social Media Policy and Procedures. Let the ET go back and see from when I started posting on Social Media after I had given www.leyf.org.uk written warnings about my intentions to clear my name. If in doubt about my experiences at the hands of the ET. Read www.acas’org.uk/researchpapers)  
NOTES
1. This Order constitutes a notice of Hearing pursuant to rule 58 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
(Edit: The ET failed to take any of my concerns into consideration from the time I meet Mr John Fenton on the 15th March 2016. Maybe that’s why Judge Freer and CO should go back to examine the fact of how they were proper taken for a ride by the 7 Witnesses and Barrister Jones. Because as I put in writing the Respondent breach every Rule of Law and did not update the contract I signed on the 7th October in line with the Equality Act 2010 www.equalityhumanrights.com).
2. Failure to comply with this order may result in an award of costs being made against the defaulting party.
(Edit: Why did the ET conveniently forgotten about the way they tried to stitch me up over the Telephone Concilliation? The way I was treated up to the time of the hearing is disgusting. And Judge Freer allowed Barrister Jones to continue with her rediculing of my disabilities throughout the case. That’s why www.voicetheunion.org.uk, thinking they are going to get away with still taking my fee? I have not worked since I resigned with a nervous breakdown. But worse still the union rep Darren Mohan disappeared without trace after accompanying me the the Disciplinary Hearing. The amount of measures the Respondent used to gag me was carried further by the ET).  
3. The Tribunal may also make a further Order (an “Unless Order”) providing that unless it is complied with, the claim or, as the case may be, the response shall be struck out on the date of non-compliance without further consideration of the proceedings.
(Edit: Why did the ET not taken any of my correspondences about the Respondent’s non-complinace into account? The Respondent was allowed to pervert the course of justice. Rashid Iqbal resigned but was still coming to court and lying. There were reviews on the Respondent’s website about the discrimination still going on. One of the reviews was from a complainant that caused the Disciplinary which led to my Mental Health Meltdown. Jyoti Sharma, listed in the ET case as Jyoti Bhardwaj. See www.nurseryworld.co.uk for evidence of my contributions to the Respondent’s organisation). 
4. An Order may be varied or revoked upon application by a person affected by the Order or by an Employment Judge on his or her own initiative.
(Edit: As can be seen from the reserve judgement online the ET was/is bias in favour of the Respondent. I advised them to make checks, but they are such bigots that’s why they ended up with https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016).
21 December 2016
Sent to the parties on:
12 January 2017
By Valeriya Kachanova
V Kachanova
For the Tribunal Office
2
I just want to make sure that my implicit knowledge is made explicit, in line with developments in this case. Today I read on Facebook, in a Nursery World Magazine postings about certain developments that might have some bearings on the Employment Appeals Tribunal. I have used the Freedom of Information and Data Protection Act Section 7 to ask LEYF Nurseries for access to my FILE. This has been withheld before I transferred from Luton Street. To date I am still dealing with the incompetence of those who are operating LEYF. But stranger than fiction, I am still waiting on the Ministry of Justice UK to deliver my documents.
Not to mention my Windrush Generation experiences with the Department for Work and Pensions – DWP and HMRC. But the cowshit platter must go to the Metropolitan Police Service for allowing www.peachespublications.co.ukWinsome Duncan: Author, Artist & Book Confidence Coach to make an utter arse of them?
If in doubt about the outcome, please see https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 for the bigots that made my life a living hell from the time I returned from burying my mother. But then they are so corrupt that they informed the EAT that the Rcism claims was tried. I was informed that I have to write to the EAT to inform them of my disabilities. But of course there was a Court Management Order for Medical Reports. But as you can see in most cases is blind leading blind in society when it comes to the Criminal Justice System. 
But thank you Jesus, I will be showcasing my photos with the prestigious persons and hoping their luck rub off on me? I need a consultations with the PM Theresa May. But I am afraid I can’t rely on my MP.